Originally proposed by
Eric Kandel as a new intellectual framework for the XXI century psychiatry and supported in Italy, among others, by
Mauro Mancia, the dialogue between neuroscience and psychoanalysis has become in recent years the most advanced frontier of the interdisciplinary research in psychology; the challenge of bringing psychoanalysis in the field of scientifically verifiable therapies could be won by abandoning the mandatory reference to metapsychology, as advocated among others in Italy by
Antonio Imbasciati, and by focusing instead on the biology of mind.
While many neuroscientists showed keen interest in the psychoanalytic theories - such as, for example,
Antonio Damasio, Mark Solms, Cristina Alberini and Vittorio Gallese - the opposite was not true for the official psychoanalytic institutions whose response was unfortunately mainly marked by resistance or indifference - consider for example the long
querelle "The case against neuropsychoanalysis" on the pages of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis.
Most fascinating and suggestive neuroscientific discoveries in various subject areas at the core of our theoretical work - such as emotion, decision-making, the unconscious, the interpersonal relationship, intersubjectivity, love, motivation, pleasure and reward, choice and free will in our behavior - are therefore still largely to be worked through and assimilated. Only by incorporating them in our theories we will able to do justice to the richness of more than a hundred years of psychoanalytic research.
We firstly published in 2005 on the Internet (at
Psychomedia )
Pionieri o Emigranti? Viaggio con la psicoanalisi nelle terre di confine (Pioneers or Emigrants? A journey with psychoanalysis in the borderlands) (which we later updated in
2007)
Some years later we published
La psicoanalisi nelle terre di confine (Psychoanalysis in the Borderlands);
you can find online a
presentation of the book and
a review of it by Maria Ponsi - whom we thank - on the online pages of the
Rivista di Psicoanalisi.
The dialogue between neuroscience and psychoanalysis was later the subject of a series of conferences and seminars and more recently we updated our research in the chapter
Il contributo delle neuroscienze al pensiero psicoanalitico (The contribution of neuroscience to psychoanalytic thought), in the volume
Psicoanalisi senza teoria freudiana) (Psychoanalysis without Freudian theory) published by Borla and edited by Antonio Imbasciati (October 2013) and in the chapter
Cavarsela alla meno peggio. Psicoanalisi e neuroscienze (Making the best of a bad job: Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience), in the volume
Neuroscienze e teoria psicoanalitica. Verso una teoria integrata del funzionamento mentale (Neuroscience and psychoanalytic theory. Towards an integrated theory of mental functioning) published by Springer and edited by Loredana Cena and Antonio Imbasciati (February 2014).
A more recent update can be found in the chapter
Conscio e inconscio nell'era delle neuroscienze. Cos'è mai la coscienza? in the volume
Psicologia Clinica Perinatale. Neuroscienze e psicoanalisi, edited by Antonio Imbasciati and Loredana Cena (FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2017, pg. 40-70) and in my foreword
Making the best of a bad job to
Building Bridges, The Impact of Neuropsychoanalysis on Psychoanalytic Clinical Sessions edited by Rosa Spagnolo (Routledge, London & New York, 2018, pg. xi-xix).
Our research is still in progress,
as our blog
La psicoanalisi nelle terre di confine shows.
Unfortunately all the mentioned papers and publications (except the very last one) are not available in English.